← Back to home

Herb Safety References

A curated starting point for checking historical herbal claims against contemporary sources.

Purpose
A browsable index of authoritative sources for cross-checking whether herbs in Margaret Grieve's A Modern Herbal (1931) are considered harmful or potentially harmful today.
Scope
This is a reference list only. It does not classify any specific herb; use the URL patterns to investigate an individual plant.
Maintainer
Brian / Helena

Herb Safety References


How to use this document

For each herb in Grieve you want to verify, work down the **Recommended

starting points** section first, then move to specialised sources if

needed. Each source below lists:

the URL or use it in the site's own search box.

identification?

1,017 herbs this source has entries for.


Recommended starting points

These three sources together cover most cases. Start here.

1. Drugs.com — Herb Database

(then click "Herb" filter, or go direct via

https://www.drugs.com/npp/<herb>.html)

/ "Pregnancy" / "Interactions" / "Side effects"** section per herb.

Each herb has a clean traffic-light style summary of evidence and

harm.

(yarrow, chamomile, foxglove, comfrey, St John's Wort) — most are

here. Less common herbs aren't.

Safe / Possibly Unsafe / Likely Unsafe" grading.

2. MedlinePlus — Herbs and Supplements (NIH)

(alphabetical list) — or

https://medlineplus.gov/search/?query=<herb>%20herb

"Warnings" / "Side effects" / "Interactions" sections. Includes

reliability ratings for the evidence.

statements.

3. Plants For A Future (PFAF)

(e.g. https://pfaf.org/user/Plant.aspx?LatinName=Digitalis+purpurea)

Hazards"** prominently listed for each species. Also notes

contraindications.

North American temperate herbs are here.

reliable.


Regulatory and government sources

Authoritative; useful for legal/compliance-grade statements.

4. EMA — European Medicines Agency HMPC Monographs

https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/herbal-medicicinal-products/european-union-monographs-and-list-entries

lists traditional use, non-clinical safety data, clinical safety,

and contraindications.

5. NIH Office of Dietary Supplements — Fact Sheets

tolerable upper intake levels.

6. Health Canada — Natural Health Products

risk statements and warnings.

7. TGA — Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration

ingredients.


Clinical and consumer references

Good for plain-language checks.

8. Mayo Clinic — Drugs & Supplements

9. WebMD — Herbs & Vitamins A-Z

(search the WebMD vitamins index for the herb name)

interactions, and "When to use caution" sections.

10. LiverTox — NIH Liver Injury Database (Herbal section)

intro) or browse the table of contents for specific agents.

(kava, comfrey, germander, chaparral, etc.). Each entry has case

reports and severity grading.

claims liver-supporting use for a given herb.


Botanical and pharmacognosy references

Specialised depth for serious cross-checking.

11. NAPRALERT

https://www.napralert.org/

Indexed literature on pharmacology, toxicology, ethnomedicine.

university library.

12. AHPA Botanical Safety Handbook

https://www.ahpa.org/Resources/BotanicalSafetyHandbook

herb has a Class 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 safety rating and detailed notes.

manufacturers.

13. HerbMed — American Botanical Council

for full access)

Summarises clinical trials and safety data.

14. Hager's Handbook (HagerROM)

https://link.springer.com/referencework/10.1007/978-3-642-16428-1

chemical structures, pharmacology, toxicology.


Plant identification and natural product databases

Useful for taxonomic verification and cross-referencing.

15. USDA Plants Database

"Known Hazards" in the Plant Profile.

16. POWO — Plants of the World Online (Kew Gardens)

or search https://powo.science.kew.org/results?q=<herb>

best taxonomic standard — useful for confirming the correct

Latin name before searching other sources.

17. Plants of the World (POWO) — toxicity annotations

*Aconitum napellus*, *Digitalis purpurea*). Inconsistent — better

for taxonomy than for toxicity.

18. iNaturalist

toxicity flags exist but are not authoritative.

species; don't rely on its toxicity annotations.


Adverse-event reporting databases

For confirmed harm after the fact.

19. FDA Poisonous Plant Database

but covers medicinal herbs too.

20. MHRA Yellow Card Scheme (UK)

or substance)

herbal products.


Tier-2 / less authoritative but useful for discovery

For breadth / discovery — use sparingly and cross-check before relying

on them.

21. Wikipedia — Category: Poisonous plants

and subcategories.

Useful for discovery ("did I miss that this species is poisonous?").

above before quoting.

22. Practical Herbalism (and similar trade books)

including safety notes.

23. Herbal Medicine (Ronald Hoffman, etc.)

safety chapters.

24. Chinese Pharmacopoeia / TCM references

relevant to Grieve (some herbs overlap).


Quick lookup workflow

For any given herb in Grieve:

1. Get the Latin binomial. Use POWO (#16) or Wikipedia to confirm.

2. Quick toxicity check. Drugs.com (#1), MedlinePlus (#2), or PFAF (#3).

3. Liver risk? Check LiverTox (#10) if the herb is taken internally.

4. Regulatory status? Check EMA (#4) or NIH ODS (#5).

5. Cross-reference with AHPA Botanical Safety Handbook (#12) if

available locally.

This covers ~90% of cases. For rare or contested herbs, escalate to

NAPRALERT (#11) or Hager's (#14).


Notes on usage for Grieve's 1931 text

"harmless" or "useful" have since been reclassified. Don't take her

safety statements as authoritative.

{Drugs.com grade} + {LiverTox entry} + {EMA/HMPC monograph}.

sufficient.

MedlinePlus "Pregnancy" and LactMed (next to MedlinePlus) — Grieve's

pregnancy advice is unreliable by modern standards.


How to extend this list

If you find a useful source, add it with:

Keep the table of contents at the top in sync.